[31-1] Do the following 3 things to do a Proof for the
NB: This is the same argument that you worked on
in Exercise 27 to use TT for testing
validity. Follow the three steps:
1. Assign P, Q, and R to the atomic sentences in the
order of appearance in the argument.
2. Formalize the argument.
3. Derive the conclusion from the premises by
using the rules of inference.
P1: If things are caused to exist,
then the infinite regress of existence is not possible.
P2: God is not the ultimate cause of existence,
only if the infinite regress of existence is possible.
P3: By the way, things are caused to exist.
C: Therefore, God is the ultimate cause of existence.
[31-2] “Derive” the conclusion (C) from the 3 premises
(1 to 3) in a formalized argument below by
employing rules of inference (i.e., proof, where
you need to come up with additional steps beyond
3 below to lead you to the conclusion):
1. (R V S) -> (T -> K)
3. R V S
Exercise 33 … (For-Credit of 5 points)
[33-1] Come up with an instance of argument that conforms to HS.
[33-2] Derive the conclusion from the given premises in
the argument below by utilizing the rules of
inference (hint: use HS, MT, DS, or some other
combination, as an alternative is available
1: A V B
2: C -> D
3: A -> C
The post [31-1] Do the following 3 things to do a Proof for the following argument:
Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts
(USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)