ASSESSMENT 4BUS707 – Applied Business ResearchT1 2018ASSESSMENT 4: Research Proposal – 50%This assessment is designed to allow students to present and justify appropriate method(s) for a research project…COIT20248 Assignment 2 – Website Design and ModellingPresentation and Written Assessment Due date: Week 11 Friday (25 May 2018) 12:00 am AEST ASSESSMENTWeighting: 30% Length: No fixed length 2ObjectivesThis…Assignment need to paraphraseNIT6160 Assignment 2 Project: Data Mining using RThis project is worth 20% of the total assessment of this unit, and is due on week 12.The goal of this project is to applying association rule mining, classification…Research based on the last assignment that you guys did. the aasignment was awesome and i secured very good marks. its of 4000 words but you can just write 3000 words. read all the instructions thoroughly …Assignment Three (Individual): e-Portfolio (45%)Due: before 11pm 28/5/18The main objective of assignment task 3 is to convert the logical-level design to a physical database using Microsoft Access software….OverviewThe student is to write a journal article (for mock publication) about a topic of relevance to Registered Nurses, particularly those beginning their practice. The topic is to be selected from the…Show All Questions

FIND A SOLUTION  AT  Academic Writers Bay

ASSESSMENT 4BUS707 – Applied Business ResearchT1 2018ASSESSMENT 4: Research Proposal – 50%This assessment is designed to allow students to present and justify appropriate method(s) for a research project designed to address the research question posed. This assessment relates to Learning Outcomes a, b and d.There are two components of the assessment:• Written proposal: 40%• Oral presentation: 10%Based on the Research Question developed in Assessment 2, students should develop a research design aimed at providing insights and/or answers to the question. Students should make any recommended adjustments to the content of Assessment 2, based on feedback provided, prior to including it in Assessment 4.This assessment requires students to choose and justify the most appropriate research design, clearly explaining WHY the chosen design will best answer the research question and is most appropriate in the specific circumstances. Students should clearly justify their recommended research and analysis methods.Note: Other than in exceptional circumstances, Assessment 4 of this subject is intended to form the basis of the student’s Research Project in BUS710 Research Project, following appropriate adjustments recommended in feedbackWritten Proposal: The proposal will contain the following information:1. Title Page2. Abstract/Executive Summary3. Introduction to the research (assessment 2, revised if necessary)4. Research Problem and Research Objective (assessment 2, revised if necessary)5. Theoretical Background/Literature review (Based on assessment 3, expand and elaborate)6. Research Methodology7. Reference List: Formatted using Harvard (Anglia) style.8. Appendix: include proposed ethical approval form and informed consent form if relevant.Note : please see the detail checklist of each section (page 3 of this guide)Submission Details– Individual Assessment– Word limit: 4000 words (±10%) (excluding reference list)– You need to state the word count of the assessment on the cover page.– The review should be professionally presented using proper headings and sub-headings, in Arial 10pt or Times New Roman 12pt, single space. Harvard (Anglia) style referencing.– Submission deadline Week 10 – Saturday 26 May 2018, by 11.59pm– Softcopy to be uploaded on Turnitin via Moddle links– Late penalties and extensions:An important part of business life and key to achieving KOI’s graduate outcome of Professional Skills is the ability to manage workloads and meet deadlines. Consequently, any assessment items such as in- class quizzes and assignments missed or submitted after the due date/time will attract a penalty. Penalty for written assessment is – 5% of the total available marks per calendar day unless an extension is approved– Applying for extension:If students are unable to submit or attend an assessment when due, and extensions are possible, they must apply by completing the appropriate Application for Extension form available from the Student Information Centre in Moodle, the KOI Website (Policies and Forms) and the Reception Desk (Market St and Kent St), as soon as possible but no later than three (3) working days of the assessment due date. The completed form must be emailed with supporting documentation to academic@koi.edu.au.Students and lecturers / tutors will be advised of the outcome of the extension request as soon as practicable. Appropriate documentary evidence to support the request for an extension must be supplied. Please remember there is no guarantee of an extension being granted, and poor organisation is not a satisfactory reason to be granted an extension.Marks out of 40 will be awarded on how well the student addressed the following criteriaCriteria % MarksMakes adjustments to Assessment 2 elements based on feedback provided 10%Addresses each of the elements of the proposal 10%Provides evidence of knowledge and skills specific to the research question 20%Uses appropriate theoretical support and applies creativity in the application of theory to the research question20%Discusses and justifies the decisions made in choice of research and analysis methods20%Organises information coherently and communicates ideas accurately and appropriately10 %Present the information in a professional manner with correct referencing.10%Note : A full Marking Rubric will be provided in Moodle.
Guideline and Checklist for Final Proposal (A4)1. Title PageChoose an interesting title for the report, the title should indicate the nature of problem/research being investigated. If client organisation is used, the name of the organization should be part of the title.2. Abstract/Executive SummaryExecutive summary should provide key information of your research, 1 page is preferably. Provide summary of :– The introduction of the research– The matter being investigated– The research design and methodology3. Introduction to the researchThis section should give convincing background about the research and why the topic is worth to research, by providing evidences to support your arguments. Key points to be included in this section are:– Introduce the topic of the research– Overview of client organization (if any)– What real problem does the research seek to resolve and why is it important to research this topic– Outline the structure of this proposal.4. Research problem and research objectivesThis section should be straightforward, state the overall research problem and research objectives based on your brief research plan (A1), revised A1 if necessary.5. Theoretical Background/Literature reviewThis section is expected to be the extended version of your A3 (structure literature review), therefore, you should not copy paste your A3 into this section, instead you need to use your A3 is a basis to do a comprehensive literature review. Around 10 extra literatures are required (on top of the four articles you used in your A3). Link your literature review back to your research problem.6. Research Design and MethodologyThis section should provide detail plan of research design and research methodology. It should consist information on:– Inform and justify the type of research (exploratory, descriptive or causal)– Inform and justify the research approach (quantitative, qualitative or mixed approach)– Describe the type of data will be used (primary or secondary data)– Describe how data will be collected: interview, focus group or observation for qualitative research, and/or survey and experiment for quantitative research– Describe and justify the sample: sampling frame, sampling methods and technique, sampling characteristics and size.– Inform how the data will be analysed : theme-based analysis for qualitative research and statistical analysis for quantitative research, or a combination of both for mixed approach)– Explain how the methodology plan address all ethical concern.Please note: only provide an overview of YOUR research design and methodology, do not discuss theory on research methodology.7. Reference List : Formatted using Harvard (Anglia) style.8. Appendix : include proposed ethical approval form and informed consent form if relevant
Application for Ethics ApprovalStudent DetailsName :Student Number :Email :Subject (Code/Name) :Supervisor DetailsName :Email :Proposed Research Details :Topic:Summary of the proposed research project, including brief description of methodology (bullet points where applicable)Ethics Checlist (Participants)How do you propose to select your participants ?Will your research involve adults who might be identified by you or anyone else reading the research ? (Yes/No). If yes, how will you obtain their consent ?Does your research involve children under eighteen years old ? (Yes/No)Ethics Checlist (Participants)Will your research take place in an institution ? (Yes/No)Are in a position of power over participants ? (Yes/No), if yes, describe any ethical implication an dhow you deal with themDescribe any risk or harm to participants which might be associated with yoru research and how would you propose to minimese these risksPrivacy and ConfidentialityHow will you protect the confidentiality and privacy of your participants ?Will it be possible to identify participants from published data ? (Yes/No), if yes, is there any ethical issue which may arise from such identification.Data Collection and StorageWho will have access to the data ?How will you store the data in order to ensure its securityNote : Ethics Approval Form is not counted toward the word count of the assessment, only fill in this form if applicable. Include this form as appendices.
Oral Presentation:Students are to present their proposal to the class as if the audience had the authority to grant approval for the research to ‘go ahead’.The presentation should contain the following information:a) Research project titleb) Introduction to the researchc) Research problem and objectivesd) Literature reviewe) Research design and methodologyf) Ethical considerationg) SummaryPresentation Details– Individual Assessment– Oral Presentations should be 5 minutes– The slides should be be supported using appropriate visual, Presentation power point template is provided (downloadable from Moddle).– Students should not just read their proposal – students reading rather than presenting will find it difficult to pass this part of the assessment.– Presentation schedule Week 11 Monday 28 May 2018 (batch 1) and Week 12 Monday 4 June 2018 (batch 2) during tutorials– Late penalties and extensions:An important part of business life and key to achieving KOI’s graduate outcome of Professional Skills is the ability to manage workloads and meet deadlines. Consequently, any assessment items such as in- class quizzes and assignments missed or submitted after the due date/time will attract a penalty. However, for in-class assessment, no extensions permitted or granted – a make-up test may only be permitted under very special circumstances where acceptable supporting evidence is provided. Presentation is considered as in-class assessment, therefore no extensions permitted or granted – no presentation = 0 marks. The rules for make-up presentations are the same as for missing in-class tests– Applying for extension:For in-class assessment, a make-up presentation may only be permitted under very special circumstances where acceptable supporting evidence is provided. If students are unable to attend an assessment when due, and extensions are possible, they must apply by completing the appropriate Application for Extension form available from the Student Information Centre in Moodle, the KOI Website (Policies and Forms) and the Reception Desk (Market St and Kent St), as soon as possible but no later than three (3) working days of the assessment due date. The completed form must be emailed with supporting documentation to academic@koi.edu.au.Students and lecturers / tutors will be advised of the outcome of the extension request as soon as practicable. Appropriate documentary evidence to support the request for an extension must be supplied. Please remember there is no guarantee of an extension being granted, and poor organisation is not a satisfactory reason to be granted an extension.Marks out of 10 will be awarded on how well the student demonstrate the following criteria :Criteria% MarksStructures and demonstrates organisation in the presentation ofinformation 10%Communicates clearly and effectively20%Demonstrates professional presentation skills20%Designs and uses appropriate visual aids to support the presentation20%Gains audience involvement20%
Responds to questions. 10 %Note : A full Marking Rubric will be provided in Moodle.

Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts

(USA, AUS, UK & CA  PhD. Writers)

>> CLICK HERE TO ORDER 100% ORIGINAL PAPERS FROM Academic Writers Bay <<

#065

SPA233 Corporations LawSemester 1 2018Assessment 23 TopicsTopic 1 – Bibek’s NewsagencyBibek has a successful newsagency business in Sydney. His customer base is becoming wider because he manages the business…COIT 20268 – Responsive Web Design (RWD)(Term 1 – 2018)- Portfolio 2- Practical Assessment 2BackgroundHouse of Cards, is a sole-proprietor with a proper shop front (i.e. an actual physical building where…HOLMES INSTITUTEFACULTY OFHIGHER EDUCATIONHOLMES INSTITUTEFACULTY OF HIGHER EDUCATIONUNIT OUTLINEHM2022 ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE & EFFECTIVENESS2018Holmes Institute is committed to providing the highest…HOLMES INSTITUTEFACULTY OFHIGHER EDUCATIONHOLMES INSTITUTEFACULTY OF HIGHER EDUCATIONUNIT OUTLINEHC3131 Integrated Business Management Project2018Holmes Institute is committed to providing the highest…Task 2 (For team member 2)1. Do you require white card for the project your team has been working for last 10 weeks? If yes, elaborate the requirements to acquire white card in your project. If no, analyze…2. the organisation as a whole and formal communication channels – establishing and maintaining formal and informal channels of communication downward, upward and horizontally.What is organisational communicaiton?Formal…Assessment 2, 3000-3500 wordsShow All Questions

FIND A SOLUTION  AT  Academic Writers Bay

Recent Question/Assignment
SPA233 Corporations LawSemester 1 2018Assessment 23 TopicsTopic 1 – Bibek’s NewsagencyBibek has a successful newsagency business in Sydney. His customer base is becoming wider because he manages the business very well and because his customers like his friendly smile and manner. Bibek’s income is increasing, as his tax, but he wants to expand his business.Bimana is one of Bibek’s best customers. Bimana tells Bibek that he should incorporate his business as a sole trader.Bibek comes to your office seeking your advice. Bibek wants to know if what Bimana has told him is true and what you would suggest he do (that is, what is the best legal structure for his business) together with details of the steps and costs involved in setting up that business structure.Advise Bibek.Topic 2 – Types of Companies(a) What are the basic differences between a proprietary company and a public company in Australia?(b) What are the differences between a company limited by shares and a company limited by guarantee in Australia?Topic 3 – Delhi Australian Curries LimitedThe members/shareholders of Delhi Australian Curries Limited have asked the directors of that company to call a meeting of the company to discuss the performance of the directors in relation to a number of contracts.The directors refuse to call the meeting.The members/shareholders still want a members’ meeting to take place.The members/shareholders come to your office seeking your advice.Advise the members/shareholders as to what they can do.

Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts

(USA, AUS, UK & CA  PhD. Writers)

>> CLICK HERE TO ORDER 100% ORIGINAL PAPERS FROM Academic Writers Bay <<

#065

ASSESSMENT 4BUS707 – Applied Business ResearchT1 2018ASSESSMENT 4: Research Proposal – 50%This assessment is designed to allow students to present and justify appropriate method(s) for a research project…Question 1.The 2017 Annual report for Westfarmers is provided on the Moodie Shell or at the following web si. (https://ift.tt/2wUi48u have one assignment of Thesis (2000 words)Due date – 27 May 2018 (Sunday)Topic – -Impact of Gender on the perception of Agent Based Technology-Research Proposal = Introduce the problem, research question,…FACULTY OF HIGHER EDUCATIONIndividual assignment 1 – Article CritiqueAssessment Weight: 20%• Students are required to write an article critique of 1,500 wordso The article that you must read and critically…. Organising3.1 TheoryBefore you can describe the relationship of your findings to the theory, you need to give your reader an overview of the theory. In this section provide an overview of organising…Unit PPMP20010: Ex411V CQUniversity Unit Profile X IR 0 0 XC II Secure I https://ift.tt/2rS4U63 atd0 52 Practical AssessmentAssessment Title Project…ACC100 – Group Assignment (15 marks)Your group (3-4 students) is appointed to prepare a special-purpose financial report for the start-up one-person accounting practice owned by Alex Chae. Your group can…Show All Questions

FIND A SOLUTION  AT  Academic Writers Bay

ASSESSMENT 4BUS707 – Applied Business ResearchT1 2018ASSESSMENT 4: Research Proposal – 50%This assessment is designed to allow students to present and justify appropriate method(s) for a research project designed to address the research question posed. This assessment relates to Learning Outcomes a, b and d.There are two components of the assessment:• Written proposal: 40%• Oral presentation: 10%Based on the Research Question developed in Assessment 2, students should develop a research design aimed at providing insights and/or answers to the question. Students should make any recommended adjustments to the content of Assessment 2, based on feedback provided, prior to including it in Assessment 4.This assessment requires students to choose and justify the most appropriate research design, clearly explaining WHY the chosen design will best answer the research question and is most appropriate in the specific circumstances. Students should clearly justify their recommended research and analysis methods.Note: Other than in exceptional circumstances, Assessment 4 of this subject is intended to form the basis of the student’s Research Project in BUS710 Research Project, following appropriate adjustments recommended in feedbackWritten Proposal: The proposal will contain the following information:1. Title Page2. Abstract/Executive Summary3. Introduction to the research (assessment 2, revised if necessary)4. Research Problem and Research Objective (assessment 2, revised if necessary)5. Theoretical Background/Literature review (Based on assessment 3, expand and elaborate)6. Research Methodology7. Reference List: Formatted using Harvard (Anglia) style.8. Appendix: include proposed ethical approval form and informed consent form if relevant.Note : please see the detail checklist of each section (page 3 of this guide)Submission Details– Individual Assessment– Word limit: 4000 words (±10%) (excluding reference list)– You need to state the word count of the assessment on the cover page.– The review should be professionally presented using proper headings and sub-headings, in Arial 10pt or Times New Roman 12pt, single space. Harvard (Anglia) style referencing.– Submission deadline Week 10 – Saturday 26 May 2018, by 11.59pm– Softcopy to be uploaded on Turnitin via Moddle links– Late penalties and extensions:An important part of business life and key to achieving KOI’s graduate outcome of Professional Skills is the ability to manage workloads and meet deadlines. Consequently, any assessment items such as in- class quizzes and assignments missed or submitted after the due date/time will attract a penalty. Penalty for written assessment is – 5% of the total available marks per calendar day unless an extension is approved– Applying for extension:If students are unable to submit or attend an assessment when due, and extensions are possible, they must apply by completing the appropriate Application for Extension form available from the Student Information Centre in Moodle, the KOI Website (Policies and Forms) and the Reception Desk (Market St and Kent St), as soon as possible but no later than three (3) working days of the assessment due date. The completed form must be emailed with supporting documentation to academic@koi.edu.au.Students and lecturers / tutors will be advised of the outcome of the extension request as soon as practicable. Appropriate documentary evidence to support the request for an extension must be supplied. Please remember there is no guarantee of an extension being granted, and poor organisation is not a satisfactory reason to be granted an extension.Marks out of 40 will be awarded on how well the student addressed the following criteriaCriteria % MarksMakes adjustments to Assessment 2 elements based on feedback provided 10%Addresses each of the elements of the proposal 10%Provides evidence of knowledge and skills specific to the research question 20%Uses appropriate theoretical support and applies creativity in the application of theory to the research question20%Discusses and justifies the decisions made in choice of research and analysis methods20%Organises information coherently and communicates ideas accurately and appropriately10 %Present the information in a professional manner with correct referencing.10%Note : A full Marking Rubric will be provided in Moodle.
Guideline and Checklist for Final Proposal (A4)1. Title PageChoose an interesting title for the report, the title should indicate the nature of problem/research being investigated. If client organisation is used, the name of the organization should be part of the title.2. Abstract/Executive SummaryExecutive summary should provide key information of your research, 1 page is preferably. Provide summary of :– The introduction of the research– The matter being investigated– The research design and methodology3. Introduction to the researchThis section should give convincing background about the research and why the topic is worth to research, by providing evidences to support your arguments. Key points to be included in this section are:– Introduce the topic of the research– Overview of client organization (if any)– What real problem does the research seek to resolve and why is it important to research this topic– Outline the structure of this proposal.4. Research problem and research objectivesThis section should be straightforward, state the overall research problem and research objectives based on your brief research plan (A1), revised A1 if necessary.5. Theoretical Background/Literature reviewThis section is expected to be the extended version of your A3 (structure literature review), therefore, you should not copy paste your A3 into this section, instead you need to use your A3 is a basis to do a comprehensive literature review. Around 10 extra literatures are required (on top of the four articles you used in your A3). Link your literature review back to your research problem.6. Research Design and MethodologyThis section should provide detail plan of research design and research methodology. It should consist information on:– Inform and justify the type of research (exploratory, descriptive or causal)– Inform and justify the research approach (quantitative, qualitative or mixed approach)– Describe the type of data will be used (primary or secondary data)– Describe how data will be collected: interview, focus group or observation for qualitative research, and/or survey and experiment for quantitative research– Describe and justify the sample: sampling frame, sampling methods and technique, sampling characteristics and size.– Inform how the data will be analysed : theme-based analysis for qualitative research and statistical analysis for quantitative research, or a combination of both for mixed approach)– Explain how the methodology plan address all ethical concern.Please note: only provide an overview of YOUR research design and methodology, do not discuss theory on research methodology.7. Reference List : Formatted using Harvard (Anglia) style.8. Appendix : include proposed ethical approval form and informed consent form if relevant
Application for Ethics ApprovalStudent DetailsName :Student Number :Email :Subject (Code/Name) :Supervisor DetailsName :Email :Proposed Research Details :Topic:Summary of the proposed research project, including brief description of methodology (bullet points where applicable)Ethics Checlist (Participants)How do you propose to select your participants ?Will your research involve adults who might be identified by you or anyone else reading the research ? (Yes/No). If yes, how will you obtain their consent ?Does your research involve children under eighteen years old ? (Yes/No)Ethics Checlist (Participants)Will your research take place in an institution ? (Yes/No)Are in a position of power over participants ? (Yes/No), if yes, describe any ethical implication an dhow you deal with themDescribe any risk or harm to participants which might be associated with yoru research and how would you propose to minimese these risksPrivacy and ConfidentialityHow will you protect the confidentiality and privacy of your participants ?Will it be possible to identify participants from published data ? (Yes/No), if yes, is there any ethical issue which may arise from such identification.Data Collection and StorageWho will have access to the data ?How will you store the data in order to ensure its securityNote : Ethics Approval Form is not counted toward the word count of the assessment, only fill in this form if applicable. Include this form as appendices.
Oral Presentation:Students are to present their proposal to the class as if the audience had the authority to grant approval for the research to ‘go ahead’.The presentation should contain the following information:a) Research project titleb) Introduction to the researchc) Research problem and objectivesd) Literature reviewe) Research design and methodologyf) Ethical considerationg) SummaryPresentation Details– Individual Assessment– Oral Presentations should be 5 minutes– The slides should be be supported using appropriate visual, Presentation power point template is provided (downloadable from Moddle).– Students should not just read their proposal – students reading rather than presenting will find it difficult to pass this part of the assessment.– Presentation schedule Week 11 Monday 28 May 2018 (batch 1) and Week 12 Monday 4 June 2018 (batch 2) during tutorials– Late penalties and extensions:An important part of business life and key to achieving KOI’s graduate outcome of Professional Skills is the ability to manage workloads and meet deadlines. Consequently, any assessment items such as in- class quizzes and assignments missed or submitted after the due date/time will attract a penalty. However, for in-class assessment, no extensions permitted or granted – a make-up test may only be permitted under very special circumstances where acceptable supporting evidence is provided. Presentation is considered as in-class assessment, therefore no extensions permitted or granted – no presentation = 0 marks. The rules for make-up presentations are the same as for missing in-class tests– Applying for extension:For in-class assessment, a make-up presentation may only be permitted under very special circumstances where acceptable supporting evidence is provided. If students are unable to attend an assessment when due, and extensions are possible, they must apply by completing the appropriate Application for Extension form available from the Student Information Centre in Moodle, the KOI Website (Policies and Forms) and the Reception Desk (Market St and Kent St), as soon as possible but no later than three (3) working days of the assessment due date. The completed form must be emailed with supporting documentation to academic@koi.edu.au.Students and lecturers / tutors will be advised of the outcome of the extension request as soon as practicable. Appropriate documentary evidence to support the request for an extension must be supplied. Please remember there is no guarantee of an extension being granted, and poor organisation is not a satisfactory reason to be granted an extension.Marks out of 10 will be awarded on how well the student demonstrate the following criteria :Criteria% MarksStructures and demonstrates organisation in the presentation ofinformation 10%Communicates clearly and effectively20%Demonstrates professional presentation skills20%Designs and uses appropriate visual aids to support the presentation20%Gains audience involvement20%
Responds to questions. 10 %Note : A full Marking Rubric will be provided in Moodle.

Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts

(USA, AUS, UK & CA  PhD. Writers)

>> CLICK HERE TO ORDER 100% ORIGINAL PAPERS FROM Academic Writers Bay <<

#065

ICT705Data and System IntegrationTask 2ATMC Semester 1, 2018Assessment and Submission DetailsMarks: 40% of the Total Assessment for the CourseDue Date: 11:59pm Friday, 8th June 2018 (Week 12)Submit your…The University of NewcastleLEGL6004: Law for Workplace Health & Safety 2018Assignment 2Due Date: 25 May 2018 (5PM)Weighting: 25%Choose 2 questions from the following list to answer. The word limit…news article. 15%TOTAL3. Group Assignment: Assessment criteriaDue: Week 10 (FRI 5 pm) ASSESSMENTWeighting: 25%Length: 2500 Words 3Group Assignment (Written report): 25%1. Organize yourselves into groups…subject erp systems BCO6603 Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Research Report (worth 30% of your overall mark) Due Dates : See VU Collaborate • Assignment dropbox (Turnitin) closes on : See Collaborate…DRONESHIELD LIMITED, please select this company from ASX listed companies. HI5002: Finance for Business Group Assignment (Case Study) Trimester 2018 Unit Code: HI5002 Unit Name: Finance for Business Due…subject mobile and executive computing BCO6185 Mobile and Executive Computing Assignment 2: Management Report Available Marks: 30 (individual assignment) Due Date: See VU Collaborate for Due Date Your…(I-StInstitute… Peter AcaitAu:a, of inarve.m6fe., and wcfdnweStudent AssessmentProject Assessment Task 1PART AFor this task, you are to undertake project work. To develop the project, you can choose…Show All Questions

FIND A SOLUTION  AT  Academic Writers Bay

ICT705Data and System IntegrationTask 2ATMC Semester 1, 2018Assessment and Submission DetailsMarks: 40% of the Total Assessment for the CourseDue Date: 11:59pm Friday, 8th June 2018 (Week 12)Submit your assignment to Blackboard Task 2. Please follow the submission instructions in Blackboard.The assignment will be marked out of a total of 100 marks and forms 40% of the total assessment for the course. ALL assignments will be checked for plagiarism by SafeAssign system provided by Blackboard automatically.Refer to your Course Outline or the Course Web Site for a copy of the “Student Misconduct, Plagiarism and Collusion” guidelines.The assignment will be assessed according to the marking sheet. Late submission will be penalised according to the policy in the course outline. Please note Saturday and Sunday are included in the count of days late.Requests for an extension to an assignment MUST be made to the course coordinator prior to the date of submission and requests made on the day of submission or after the submission date will only be considered in exceptional circumstances. Assignment submission extensions will only be made using the official Faculty of Arts, Business and Law Guidelines.Background: Health Information TechnologyAfter evaluating various platforms, the government finally decided to adopt a Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) for its future IT infrastructure. They were impressed with your Template based, Reference Architecture approach set out in your Task 1 Report and have accepted your recommendations regarding:• Computing and storage infrastructure design, • Application / service integration, and• Information integration.However, they would like to gain a deeper understanding of the technologies behind your recommendation and have asked for a small specific demonstration of these technologies along with a brief explanation of the concepts and principles of how it works.Specifically, they have asked you to provide a demonstration web page in which the user will input a service and a post code. Upon clicking a button, a cluster map of clinics, based on the services they offer and location, will be displayed to the user.
Assignment TasksThis assignment consists of two deliverables, being: demonstration code 75%, and a report 25%. All code relating to this assignment should be contained within a folder named: Task 2– Your Name – Student Number, the folder is then to be zipped and uploaded to blackboard. The report must be uploaded separately.Important Note: For ease of demonstration, your code must be self-contained. In addition to using Standards based HTML and Python, PETL, Bottle and Parser are the only additional frameworks you should need. If you use others they must be provided and not require installation.Demonstration CodeTo demonstrate your code, you have been provided with four data sources compiled with fictitious sample data. These are:• “clinics.csv” contains the information about the clinics,• “cliniclocations.xml” contains the location coordinates for each clinic• “services.csv” contains a list of clinical services• “clinicservices.csv” contains a list of clinics and the services they offerTask 1 – Data integration demo.You are to submit a python script named “data_merger.py”.Your script should firstly clean the data then merge it into one CSV file named “clinicservicelocations.csv”.Task 1.1 Data Cleansing (6 marks)Clean data in the email address field from “clinics.csv” such that:• All spaces are removed,• The domain “myclinic.com.au” is appended to those address without a domain,Task 1.2 Data Merge (15 marks)Merge the data from the four data sources into “clinicservicelocations.csv” with the following fields (attributes):• ClinicServicesID a unique field identifying each record from clinicservices• ServiceID a foreign key linking to services from clinicservices• Service the linked title of the service from services• ClinicID a foreign key linking to clinics and locations• Clinic the name of the clinic from clinics• Suburb from clinics• State from clinics• Email cleaned email address from clinics• Lat from cliniclocations• Lon from cliniclocationsTask 2 – RESTful Web Service DemoYou are to submit a python script named “clinic_locator.py”.For tasks 2.1 to 2.2 Your script should build a RESTful web service that supports a ‘getclinics’ query from the client browser similar to “/getclinics?serviceid=x”. The server Web Service will return a JSON table with the following fields (attributes): Clinic, Service, Suburb, State, Email, Lat, Lon. Data is to come from the “clinicservicelocations.csv” you built in task 1.2.Task 2.1 Return clinics for a service (6 marks)The server will return a table of records (tuples) of clinics offering the service ID passed to it.Task 2.2 Return all unique clinics (6 marks)In the advent of a call to “getclinics?serviceid=0”, the server will return a distinct list of clinics offering any service. That is a list of all clinics listed once.Task 2.3 List of Services (6 marks)To populate your drop-down list in task 3.1 you will need to return a JSON table of all records from “services.csv” with the following fields (attributes): ServiceID, Service. The server should respond to a “getservices” request.Task 2.4 Error Handling (6 marks)Your code should handle any errors including incorrect requests.Task 3 Mashup DemoYou are to submit a HTML file “clinic_map.html” and optionally a CSS file named “clinic_map.css”.Task 3.1 Form Layout (10 marks)You are to create an input form that accepts user input for a medical service and a postcode. The input for the medical service should be a drop-down list with the first item of being “Any Service” with a value = 0 remaining items should be created dynamically from a call to getservices from task 2.3. Note: The input for the postcode should be a text box. These inputs should be accompanied with descriptors and a “Locate Clinics” button.Task 3.2 Google Map (10 marks)Clicking the “Locate Clinics” button the will trigger a “getclinics” web service to retrieve a table of clinics matching the service with attributes described in task 2. From this data you are to display a Google map marking the position of the returned clinics. The map should be centred on the input postcode and zoomed to an appropriate level to show nearby clinics, alternatively you may choose to use marker clustering which automatically centres and zooms map based on clustering.Task 3.3 Information Window Demographics (5 marks)Upon clicking a marker bubble on the map, the user will be displayed an information window containing: Clinic Name, Suburb, State and a clickable email address.Task 3.4 Information window email (5 marks)Clicking an email address link in the information window should launch the user’s email application and automatically insert the subject line “Clinic Enquiry”.ReportYou are required to write a report explaining the key concepts around the design and implementation of your demonstration system. You are also required to explain how to run your code. Finally, you are to include all code submitted in the appendices to the report, note that the code will not count towards the word count.Your report should follow the following template:Executive SummaryTable of ContentsTable of Figures (if needed)Table of Tables (if needed)1.0 Introduction2.0 Key System Concepts2.1 Data merging and cleaning2.2 RESTful Web Services2.3 Mashups3.0 Demo Running Instructions4.0 Conclusion BibliographyAppendicesReport FormatYour report should be no less than 800 words and it would be best to be no longer than 1500 words.The report must be formatted using the following guidelines:• Paragraph text 12-point Calibri single line spacing• Code Text 12-point Courier new single line spacing• Headings Arial in an appropriate type size• Margins 2.5cm on all sides• Title Page is not to contain headers, footers, or page numbering• Header is to display the Report Title (excluding the title page)• Footer to display your name and the page number (excluding the title page)• Title Page – Must not contain headers or footers. Include your name as the report’s author.• Page numberingo Executive summary to the last page of Table of Figures / Table of Tables to use roman numerals (i, ii, iii, iv)o Introduction and onwards to use conventional numerals (1, 2, 3, 4) starting at page 1 from the introduction• The report is to be created as a single Microsoft Word document (version 2007, 2010, 2013, 2016, or Office 365). No other format is acceptable and doing so will result in the deduction of marks.• The report must use the built-in features of Microsoft Word to create page numbers, section numbers, citations, cross referencing of sections, figures and tables, table of contents, table of figures, table of tables, and bibliography.Please follow the conventions detailed in:Summers, J. & Smith, B., 2014, Communication Skills Handbook, 4th Ed, Wiley, Australia.ReferencingReferences should follow the Harvard method of referencing. Note that ALL references should be from journal articles, conference papers, technical papers or a recognized expert in the field. DO NOT use Wikipedia as a reference. The use of unqualified references will result in the deduction of marks.Assignment Return and Release of GradesAssignment grades will be available on the blackboard in two weeks after the submission. An electronic assignment marking sheet will be available at this time. Where an assignment is undergoing investigation for alleged plagiarism or collusion the grade for the assignment and the assignment will be withheld until the investigation has concluded.Assignment AdviceThis assignment will take several weeks to complete and will require a good understanding of application and information integration technologies for successful completion. It is imperative that students take heed of the following points in relation to doing this assignment:1. Ensure that you clearly understand the requirements for the assignment – what must be done and what are the deliverables.2. If you do not understand any of the assignment requirements – Please ASK the course coordinator or your tutor.3. Each time you work on any aspect of the assignment reread the assignment requirements to ensure that what is required is clearly understood.4. Prior to submitting your code, you should ensure not only that it executes as required, but also looks professional. It is expected that you adhere to HTML and python standards for naming and indenting. All methods should be adequately documented such that another programmer examining your code will readily know what the code is doing.
Appendix AMarking Sheet for ATMC ICT705 2018.S1 Assignment 1Student name:Student ID:Report 25%Items Maximum Marks Marks ObtainedReport formatting (font, header and footer, table of content, numbering, correct spelling, grammar) 3Executive Summary, Introduction & Conclusion 3Concepts – Data Merging 5Concepts – RESTful Web Services 5Concepts – Mashups 5Demo Running Instructions 4Total Marks: 25Code Implementation (75%)Items Maximum Marks Marks Obtained1.1 – data_merger.py – cleaning 61.2 – data_merger.py – merging 152.1 – clinic_locator.py – Web service – Clinics 62.2 – clinic_locator.py – Web Service – All Clinics 62.3 – clinic_locator.py – Web Service – Services 62.2 – clinic_locator.py – input error handling 63.1 – clinic_map.html – form layout 103.2 – clinic_map.html – Google Map 103.3 – clinic_map.html – information window – demographics 53.4 – clinic_map.html – information window – email link 5Total Marks: 75OVERALL COMMENTS:

Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts

(USA, AUS, UK & CA  PhD. Writers)

>> CLICK HERE TO ORDER 100% ORIGINAL PAPERS FROM Academic Writers Bay <<

#065

ACCT601: Auditing and Assurance Services Semester 2, 2018Assessment 2: Group AssignmentAssessment weight : 20%Due : 13 May 2016 by 23.59Word limit: : 2500 words±10%The group assignment aims to:1….TaskYou are to prepare and submit Assessment 3 as an individual, based on the Case study scenario, and your peer to peer learning from Assessment 2 at least 8-10 appropriate references in APA style.You…H16025 Accounting Theory and Current IssuesAssessment item 2 — Group AssignmentDue date: 11.00pm Friday Week 10Weighting: 20%-Implications of International Accounting in Australia after IFRS Period-Group…HA3042 Taxation Law T1 2018 Individual Assignment Due date: Week 11 Maximum marks: 20 (20%) Instructions: This assignment is to be submitted by the due date in soft-copy only (Safe assign – Blackboard). The…Here is the one sample of my assignment and we are tendering with 3 companies. On the basis of the companies tender application, we need to submit the tender according to the marking criteria. I had sent…ASSESSMENTQualification: BSB51915 Diploma of Leadership and ManagementUnit of Competency: BSBHRM405 Support the recruitment, selection and induction of staffStudent Name:Student ID:Trainer’s name: Era…DEM511 Emergency and Disaster Management in ContextAssessment-3: ASSESSMENT DESCRIPTIONDescription/Focus: Academic PaperTOPICS: Based on the selected question – consult with the unit coordinator.Value:…Show All Questions

FIND A SOLUTION  AT  Academic Writers Bay

Recent Question/Assignment
ACCT601: Auditing and Assurance ServicesSemester 2, 2018Assessment 2: Group AssignmentAssessment weight : 20%Due : 13 May 2016 by 23.59Word limit: : 2500 words±10%The group assignment aims to:1. Give students an understanding of real life auditing issues2. Help students understand the link between theory and practice; and3. Foster students’ research, team-working, critical analysis and written communication skills.Students will form teams of up to four members. You should give careful consideration to the selection of members comprising the group. By the end of week 3, all groups must be formed, and groups should provide the names of members to the lecturer-incharge by Monday 2 April 2018. It is very important for all members to take an active part in completing the assignment and make an equal contribution. Students must notify the Lecturer-in-Charge in a timely manner and provide substantiating documentation of any problems in relation to group work. Each student should also complete the “Peer Evaluation of Team Members” sheet and hand it in to the lecturerin-charge.You are required to write a business report addressing the questions below:1. Evaluate the social responsibility of HIH by identifying where they failed.2. Identify weaknesses of HIH’s internal controls and suggest ways for improvement.3. Provide an assessment of the audit committee of HIH, the stance of the auditors regarding the audit committee, and comment on their role in the fallout of the company.4. Describe the major deficiencies of the audit and discuss if auditors could prevent the demise of HIH.Your report should include an introduction, conclusion, appropriate headings, and diagrams or graphs where appropriate. Your report should contain an introduction followed by answers to questions and a conclusion. Grading will be based on critical analysis of the issue, evidence of wide reading on topic, coherence in the development of arguments, use of appropriate evidence, and clarity of expressions. You are expected to cite at least five (5) acceptable sources. If you are not clear what constitutes an acceptable source, please consult the Lecturer-In-Charge.Grading criteria for Assessment #2Questions MaxpointIntroduction1Identify weaknesses of HIH’s internal controls and suggest ways for improvement. 4Provide an assessment of the audit committee of HIH, the stance of the auditors regarding the audit committee, and comment on their role in the fallout of the company. 4Describe the major deficiencies of the audit and discuss if auditors could prevent the demise of HIH. 4Conclusion1Format and presentation (referencing, tidiness, grammar, spelling, spacing, paragraphing, page formatting, etc.) 2Total 20Assignments will be graded by 28 May 2018, and grades will be posted on LEO.Submission guidelinesSubmission is via Turnitin only.Assignments must be submitted with an ACU cover sheet and should:Use an assignment cover sheet signed by all students.Be typed using one-and-a half (1.5) spacing left justified.Use Ariel or Times New Roman font size 12.Display a one inch margin on all sides.Appropriately cite original work, author(s) etc. Citation and referencing must conform to Harvard format both in the body of the paper and its attached reference section.Students should retain both hard and electronic copies of all work submitted forLate submission of assignmentsDue dates will be strictly adhered to. However, in the case of exceptional circumstances, students may apply for extensions in the following manner.In accordance with the ACU Assessment Procedures (para 3):You may seek extension of submission date for an assessment task prior to the due date by submitting the Application for Extension of time for an Assignment (EX) form. https://ift.tt/2HKXacUYou may seek up to five working days after the relevant due date by submitting the Special Consideration form. https://ift.tt/2r8VCTR cial_Consideration_20170615.pdfAssessment tasks submitted after the due or extended date will incur, for each whole or part of a calendar day that the work is overdue, a 5% penalty of the maximum marks available for that assessment task up to a maximum of 15%. Assessment tasks received more than three calendar days after the due or extended date will not be allocated a mark.Links for further reading about HIHHIH Insurance Group Collapse (Parliament of Australia)https://ift.tt/2qm2v3L y_Library/Publications_Archive/archive/hihinsuranceThe rise and fall of HIH Insurance Grouphttps://ift.tt/2jjyjlPThe HIH collapse: a catalyst for costly reform file:///C:/Users/bt/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/INetCache/IE/83Q7UY07/fulltext .pdfCase studies on the HIH Insurance Group file:///C:/Users/bt/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/INetCache/IE/N1RDSLAA/0610 04_BGN-0_hih_background_note.pdfThe HIH Report and Clerp 9 https://ift.tt/2qmDYeKAdams, M. A. (2005). Australian corporate governance: lessons from HIH Insurance. -One Law for All?-: 60th Annual ALTA Conference, The University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand 5-8 July 2005.Buchanan, B. (2003). Beware of the ides of March: The demise of HIH insurance, Finance Faculty Publications, University of Georgia. https://ift.tt/2IIW0i1 m.au/&httpsredir=1&article=1016&context=finance-faculty-publicationsLeung, P. & Cooper, B.J. (2005). The Mad Hatter’s corporate tea party, Managing Auditing Journal, 18 (6/7), 505-516.Mirshekary, S., Yaftian, A, M & Cross, D. (2005). Australian corporate collapse: Thecase of HIH Insurance. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 9 (3). pp. 249-258 PEER EVALUATION OF TEAM MEMBERSEach student should complete this from with respect to other students in the syndicate and hand it in to the lecturer-in-charge.Name (write full name) Meetings Quality and quantity Cooperation and team work Follow through Total scoreMeetings:1 Rarely attended meetings and when attending arrived late or left early2 Attended some group meetings, arrived late or left early on occasion3 Attended most group meetings, arrived on time, stayed for length of time scheduled4 Attended all meetings, arrived on time, stayed longer than the scheduled meeting timeQuality and quantity of output1 Contributed very little, if at all, to the paper2 Ideas were weak, and input limited, performed only work assigned3 Provided useful input most of the time and was helpful in getting tasks accomplished4 Always provided valuable input into the project and facilitated discussionsCooperation and team effort1 Created problems and was disruptive2 Went along with whatever the rest of the group decided3 Sometimes led the group, provided support for other team members on occasion4 Led the group in establishing a cooperative team environmentFollow through1 Rarely completed assignments, work completed was often not useful2 Required some prompting to complete assignments on time, several changes required3 Completed work on time with some changes required4 Completed assigned work on time and error free

Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts

(USA, AUS, UK & CA  PhD. Writers)

>> CLICK HERE TO ORDER 100% ORIGINAL PAPERS FROM Academic Writers Bay <<

#065

ACCT605 Managing Accounting Information Semester 1 2018Assessment Task 2 – Group AssignmentDue date: 11 May 2018 (Friday), Week 10, 23:00 hrsWeighting: 20%Length and/or format: about 2000 wordsHow to submit:…Assessment InformationSubject Code: BUS201Subject Name: Foundations of Business SuccessAssessment Title: Learning Contract and Portfolio (Individual assessment task)Weighting: 30%Total Marks: 30 Word Count:…Assessment 2 – Group report and group presentation: The business caseDue date: Week 11, Friday 28 May 01:00 PM AESTWeighting: 50%Length: 2000 wordsAssessment OverviewThis assessment must be completed by…Case Study Assignment (20% of the total assessment)This assignment consists of two (2) separate components consisting of a group components with two parts (Parts 1 and 2) and an individual component (Part…BUSL320 Taxation Law and Practice Take-home Assignment2018 Session 1Total Marks = 20Jacinta Wells, aged 33 lives in Melbourne and works as a management consultant. She is employed by Staedler Ltd, an American…L_ 411J 100% vStylesA41131,Cci.Ec Aa BbCcD AaBbCcLNo Spacing Heading 1 HeadingAa13bCc1,1,. NormalCharts SmartArt ReviewParagraph• .1. i .2. .3 • i.8.,.9., .10. .11. .12, .13 14.Accounting for Corporate…Assignment Topic : ASIC v Hobbs [2012] NSWSC 1276This is a case study.Subject: Business and corporation lawCourse: MPAInstructions: Please read and re-read carefully to avoid mistakes. Note : assignment…Show All Questions

FIND A SOLUTION  AT  Academic Writers Bay

Recent Question/Assignment
ACCT605 Managing Accounting Information Semester 1 2018Assessment Task 2 – Group AssignmentDue date: 11 May 2018 (Friday), Week 10, 23:00 hrsWeighting: 20%Length and/or format: about 2000 wordsHow to submit: A copy of the assignment must be uploaded onto LEO through Turnitin system with the file name as ACCT605_groupNumber.docx.Group WorkStudents are required to form a group that will work together on this assignment. Organising and monitoring contributions by group members to the assignment as well as resolving conflict are important skills developed through group work. The mark awarded for this work will be based on the written submission. All members of the group will receive the same mark. However, if disputes arise between group members and cannot be resolved within the group, the lecturer in charge will proffer mediation and, if necessary, make a decision about the proportion of marks awarded to individuals. The maximum number of group members is four (4).FormatThe group assignments should:1. be typed using 1.5 spacing justified2. use Ariel font size 113. display a 2.5 cm margin for all sides4. include page number5. quote the reference in Harvard Style formatFitzroy Health is a small medical centre with three doctors (GPs). Dr Freeman, the owner of the medical centre, will start his business in October this year. There will be three doctors and two receptionists in his medical centres. He expects there will be eight hundred patient records in the database. The consultation fees will be paid in three categories; 1. bulk bill, 2. patients pay in full amount or 3. patients pays the gaps. Dr Freeman has requested your IT consulting team to set up the accounting information systems for his new medical centre. In this project, your team is asked to do the following tasks for Dr Freeman.A. Write a proposal for Fitzroy Accounting Information Systems. In your proposal, you should include the cost of the software systems, technical requirements, implementation and training strategy, cost of annual maintenance and support.B. Briefly describe the accounting cycles, e.g. revenue cycle, expenditure cycle etc in your designed accounting system.C. Provide samples of statements of financial position, financial performance and a cash flow statement for which of these reports will be generated by your accounting systems in future. List all these sample statements in the Appendix section of your proposal.D. Provide a chart of accounts which supports above financial reporting in the Appendix section of your proposal.Marks will be allocated as below.Proposal [6 marks]Accounting Cycle [6 marks]Financial Statements [3 marks]Create data File [3 marks]Use of academic and accounting discipline conventions and sources of evidence [2 marks]Late submission of assignmentThis assignment must be handed in on the due date. Late assignment will be penalised. Any student submitting his/her assignment after the deadline but within 72 hours of it will be penalised 10% of the maximum mark available for the assignment. Any submissions after this time will receive a zero mark.Extension for an assignmentStudents may apply for consideration of circumstances, which significantly hamper their participation or performance in an assessment. These circumstances include temporary or permanent disability or exceptional and unforeseen circumstances.Applications for consideration should be submitted to the national lecturer-in-charge (NLiC) before the due date for the assessment task. Requests for extension must be made on the appropriate form on or before the due date for submission, and must demonstrate exceptional circumstances, which may warrant the granting of an extension.Rubric – Assessment Task 2: Group AssignmentILOs Criteria StandardsBelow Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds ExpectationsLevel 1 (e.g. NN) Level 2 (e.g. PA) Level 3 (e.g. CR) Level 4 (e.g. DI) Level 5 (e.g. HD)LO1, LO5 ProposalShows little to no understanding of accounting related terminology, GAAP, or understanding accounting’s role and function in business practice. Shows a basic understanding of accounting related terminology, GAAP, or understanding accounting’s role and function in business practice. Shows a good understanding of accounting related terminology, GAAP, or understanding accounting’s role and function in business practice. Shows a well-developed understanding of accounting related terminology, GAAP, or understanding accounting’s role and function in business practice. Shows an excellent accounting related terminology, GAAP, or understanding accounting’s role and function in business practice.LO2, LO3 Accounting Cycle Through entering accounting transactions, shows little to no understanding of the accounting cycle. Through entering accounting transactions, shows a basic understanding of the accounting cycle. Through entering accounting transactions, shows a good understanding of the accounting cycle. Through entering accounting transactions, shows a well-developed understanding of the accounting cycle. Through entering accounting transactions, shows a well-developed understanding of the accounting cycle more than required.LO3 FinancialStatementsShows little to no understanding of the elements of the Financial Statements or how to interpret the information contained on theFinancial Statements. Shows a basic understanding of the elements of the Financial Statements or how to interpret the information contained on the Financial Statements. Shows a good understanding of the elements of the Financial Statements or how to interpret the information contained on the Financial Statements. Shows a well-developed understanding of the elements of the Financial Statements or how to interpret the information contained on theFinancial Statements. Shows a fully understanding of the elements of the Financial Statements or how to interpret the information contained on theFinancial Statements.LO3 Create data FileShows little to no understanding of the accounting software, implements appropriate accounts, items, vendors and customers. Shows a basic understanding of the accounting software, implements appropriate accounts, items, vendors and customers. Shows a good understanding of the accounting software, implements appropriate accounts, items, vendors and customers. Shows a well-developed understanding of the accounting software, implements appropriate accounts, items, vendors and customers. Shows a fully understanding of the accounting software, implements appropriate accounts, items, vendors and customers more than required.LO2 Use of academic and accounting discipline conventions and sources of evidence Poorly written with errors in spelling, grammar.Demonstrates inconsistent use of good quality, credible and Is written according to academic genre (e.g. with introduction, conclusion or summary) and has accurate spelling, grammar, sentence Is well-written and adheres to the academic genre (e.g. withintroduction, conclusion or summary). Is very well-written and adheres to the academic genre.Consistentlydemonstrates expert use Expertly written and adheres to the academic genre.Demonstrates expert use of high-quality, crediblerelevant research sources to support and develop ideas.There are mistakes in using the Harvard style for referencing. and paragraph construction.Demonstrates consistent use of credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas, but these are not always explicit or well developed.There are no mistakes in using the Harvard style for referencing. Demonstrates consistent use of high quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas.There are no mistakes in using the Harvard style for referencing. of good quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop appropriate arguments and statements. Shows evidence of reading beyond the key reading.There are no mistakes in using the Harvard style for referencing.and relevant research sources to support and develop arguments and position statements. Shows extensive evidence of reading beyond the key reading.There are no mistakes in using the Harvard style for referencing.* This rubric is indicative of the rubrics that will be used to assess this assignment. In order to ensure the assignment is indicative of the current accounting environment, minor changes may be made to reflect these. A final version of this rubric will be made available at the time the assignment document is available.

Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts

(USA, AUS, UK & CA  PhD. Writers)

>> CLICK HERE TO ORDER 100% ORIGINAL PAPERS FROM Academic Writers Bay <<

#065

BUSL251Business and Corporations LawSession 1, 2018Assessment GuideNote – this is NOT the Unit Guide assessment guide should be read in conjunction with the Unit Guide The official Unit Guide is available…Quantitative easing (QE) policy impacts upon interest rate through different channels as pointed out by Krishnamurthy and Vissing-Jorgensen (2011). Read this article, choose ONE or TWO channels, and discuss…La Trobe UniversitySchool of LawBLST2BSL Introduction to Business Law and EthicsTrimester 1, 2018Common Law AssignmentINSTRUCTIONS1. This assignment is worth 20% of your final mark for this subject.2….COIT 20268 – Responsive Web Design (RWD)(Term 1 – 2018)Assessment details for: Written Assessment (30 marks).Main TaskSelect and undertake an in-depth evaluation of the following website:Website: https://ift.tt/2jAP3Ft TASK 2:1. select ONE case study from the list below;2. identify the ethical issues that are raised by the events described in the chosen case study3. analyse the ethical issues in relation to…ASSESSMENT BRIEFCOURSE: Bachelor of Business /Bachelor of AccountingUnit: Management PrinciplesUnit Code: MGTP102Type of Assessment: Assessment 3 – Individual Essay WritingLength/Duration: 2000 wordsCourse…AssignmentShow All Questions

FIND A SOLUTION  AT  Academic Writers Bay

Recent Question/Assignment
BUSL251Business and Corporations LawSession 1, 2018Assessment GuideNote – this is NOT the Unit Guide assessment guide should be read in conjunction with the Unit Guide The official Unit Guide is available online and is accessed separately through iLearn. TheDepartment of Accounting and Corporate GovernanceMACQUARIE UNIVERSITYFACULTY OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMICSASSESSMENT GUIDE BUSL250TEACHING STAFFConvenor: Dr Zaman Khorsed, E4A316, 98504120 – khorsed.zaman@mq.edu.auFor all inquiries concerning this Unit: busl251@mq.edu.auNote – your tutor will provide you with contact detailsRELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ASSESSMENT AND LEARNING OUTCOMESStudents are required to obtain knowledge of the relevant law and be able to apply that knowledge in a problem-solving context. This involves the ability to identify and analyse relevant issues. Assessment procedures will test both unit content and application of that content. Following are descriptions of the 3 forms of assessment in this unit including factors which are relevant to maximising results.AssessmentTiming, venue or form of assessment may change if this is necessary as a result of unit structure, reorganisation or University scheduling adjustments. If there is any change to the forms of assessment students will be notified in lectures and on iLearn.Note – the Unit Guide includes a Unit Schedule – in that Unit Schedule you will see that as there are no classes in Week 7 of session the numbering of lectures drops out of sync with the week of session upon return from the mid-session break – please be aware of this as you are noting the timing of assessments herein.1. Assessed Coursework [20%] – tutorials should be used by students to test their understanding of the unit in an environment where immediate feedback is available from the tutor – students should be prepared for tutorials and any materials that are relevant to the tutorial should be considered prior to the tutorial (this includes any tutorial questions that will be dealt with). Students must be engaged with the issues relevant to the tutorial and be involved in tutorial activities, particularly, responding to, and asking, questions – being active is an important aspect of both study and professional practice and tutorials will be of more benefit to all students if each individual is willing to participate – the mark for assessed coursework includes the aspect of attendance in that students who do not attend obviously do not participate and this will be reflected in their mark – participation though, is more than mere attendance.This assessment is about an understanding of effective communication – in the broader picture 3 aspects stand out:Engagement – note that although this obviously incorporates contributing it also involves listening attentively to both the tutor’s comments and to other students’ responses or questions – proactivity and receptiveness are both relevant.Preparation – the ability to communicate effectively and engage is based on a sound understanding of the relevant material – the better acquainted you are with tutorial issues and the relevant law the better you will be able to contribute to the class and digest matters that arise from the discussion Teamwork – although a tutorial class may seem like a large team, it is still a team – that is, there is a common goal – where each student takes some responsibility for contributing (within the parameters of the structure of the class) the standard of the whole class, and thus each of the students, improves.There are various skills and approaches involved in this assessment category but importantly these include your ability to prepare thoroughly (including knowing the relevant law and having carefully considered the tutorial questions), engage with discussion, form an opinion and acknowledge other students opinions, and communicate orally.***Following are examples of conduct that will indicate higher order performance in relation to assessed coursework – the following 3 criteria will form the essence of how your performance will be assessed:Evidence of preparation and accurate responsesInquiries, questions, or responses to questions in tutorials that indicate reading and digesting appropriate/designated materials, including bringing relevant materials (such as the tutorial questions) to class; analysing material relevant to tutorial question responses; displaying a good knowledge of the relevant law and legal terminology; using the relevant law and concepts to accurately address and interpret questions and identify and develop a comprehensive exploration of the issues; showing an ability to integrate and apply relevant law to the facts of tutorial questions and any questions raised in class; being able to evaluate the relationship between the relevant law and the issues raised by the facts/evidence disclosed by the tutorial questions to arrive at a clear argument or position, demonstrating independent well-reasoned judgementParticipation and contributionBeing proactive; asking questions relevant to the material being discussed; responding to questions or requests and displaying an understanding of the relevant law; providing concise, direct and clear responses (clear voice, eye contact, appropriate use of terminology, good time management); forming and expressing an opinion in relation to the issues arising from the material being discussed involving an evaluation and interpretation of those issuesEngagement and teamworkBeing engaged in the progress of the tutorial and following the tutorial discussion; respecting other students input, being receptive to differing viewpoints, understanding and respecting cross-cultural diversity; listening to other students responses; being attentive and alert (including note-taking where relevant)Students who consistently achieve the factors referred to in all of the above 3 criteria will receive a high mark.Students who consistently fail to achieve the factors referred to in all of the above 3 criteria will receive a low markAs different tutorials will have different tutors there will obviously be a subjective element in how assessed coursework marks are awarded – to mitigate inconsistencies the following strategies will be relevant: tutors are given instructions as to key indicators of assessed coursework performance (the factors in the previous paragraph are relevant) – at the conclusion of the unit assessed coursework marks are moderated to ensure that a particular tutor is not substantially out of alignment with the overall level of performance observable – assessed coursework marks are available at the conclusion of the unit and if a student believes on reasonable grounds that they have not been correctly assessed then they have an opportunity to raise the matter – it must be remembered though that the marks are awarded by the tutor in circumstances relating to the whole class, the whole session, and from the position of expert instructor – a student’s perception of their own performance may be helpful but is not definitive.Note that a specific penalty is relevant in circumstances where a student misses a substantial number of tutorials: Other than where a relevant application pursuant to the Special Consideration policy is approved, if a student attends less than 50% of the allotted tutorials the total available mark for tutorial participation will be reduced by 50%.2. Media Reflection Assignment [20%] – Prepare an analysis of a current (published in between 1 January 2018 – 18 May 2018) Australian newspaper/media article that relates to the material covered from Lecture 4 forward – that is, from Lecture 4 to Lecture 11 inclusive (maximum length – 500 words). To succeed in this assessment the article must be current (as defined above) and your analysis concise, showing the relationship between the article and an aspect of the unit.This assessment involves elements of critical thinking: issues raised in the article are to be articulated, analysed and thereafter interpreted in the light of the unit content.This assessment (your written analysis only, not the newspaper/media article) must be submitted via iLearn/Turnitin by 6pm Monday in Week 11 of the session. A hard-copy of the assignment (plus the relevant newspaper/media article) must also be submitted (handed-in) in your allocated/scheduled tutorial in Week 11 of the session.No extensions will be granted. There will be a deduction of 10% of the total available marks made from the total awarded mark for each 24 hour period or part thereof that the submission is late (for example, 25 hours late in submission – 20% penalty). This penalty does not apply for cases in which an application for Special Consideration is made and approved.Note: Students should individually select articles – this is an individual assignment (do not use any of the articles already posted on iLearn).Particulars of the Assignment:What is expected – Peruse business pages of newspapers such as the Sydney Morning Herald, the Age, or the Australian Financial Review during the currency of the unit (you can use Factiva through the Library to do this) and choose an article that relates to one (or more) of the topics dealt with in the material covered in Lecture 4 to Lecture 11 inclusive (the article can be found either in the hardcopy press or online) – it must be an Australian based publication because you are commenting on Australian law.How marks are allocated – Your ability to identify/align/ relate/ apply appropriate unit content (law) to the issues raised by the relevant article is the most important part of your assignment. Assignments that achieve this in a clear and concise manner will receive higher marks. Simply summarising an article, or simply reciting the law without relating it to the issues arising in the article, will not receive high marks. You should analyse the article having regard to the area(s) of law it raises – you are using the issues raised in the article to highlight how the law applies.Marking procedure – marking of your assignment will be carried out by your tutor – marks will be entered into Grades in iLearn and will be available when all assignments have been marked and entered.Time to be spent on task – see the Unit Guide.***Following are examples of factors that will indicate higher order performance in relation to your Media Reflection Assignment – the following 3 criteria will form the essence of how your performance will be assessed:Choosing an appropriate articleThe article must focus on an issue or issues that have a direct relationship to the unit content from Week 4 (Lecture 4) forward; it must be published by a reputable source such as an established newspaper (not a legal blog); it should be of appropriate length (very short or very long articles should be avoided).Ability to identify/relate relevant law to the issue(s) raised in the articleFollowing a short summary of the article chosen (including title, source and date) the assignment must show evidence of the articulation of the relevant issues and law, an analysis of those issues having regard to the relevant law, and an interpretation of the relationship between the issues evident in the article and the relevant lawA clear, ordered and concise assignmentThe assignment must be typed (font must be easily readable and of adequate size – for example, Times New Roman 12), single spaced and include a cover sheet including your relevant details: https://ift.tt/2FRQUye sheetsYour tutor must be able to easily understand what the article is about from your summary and must be able to easily see how you have used the relevant law to explain the issues that arise from the articleStudents who achieve the factors referred to in all of the above 3 criteria will receive a high mark.Students who fail to achieve the factors referred to in all of the above 3 criteria will receive a low mark3. Final Exam [60%] – this will be held at the conclusion of the unit in the formal examination period – the exam will cover Lecture 4 to 11 inclusive – to succeed in this exam you will need to have a good grasp of the relevant unit content (the law), be able to analyse and distinguish between alternatives (for example in multiple-choice questions) and to be able to identify, analyse and resolve issues arising (for example in an issues based or problem-solving format). The final exam will particularly challenge your ability to create written responses in a clear, concise and ordered manner.This assessment involves elements of critical thinking: issues raised in the exam questions will need to be interpreted, synthesised with relevant legal principles, and analysed in order to demonstrate independent well-reasoned judgement.Note: From Lecture 4 to Lecture 11 inclusive [that is from Week 4 forward] links to newspaper articles/media articles/media releases will be available on iLearn (there will be 5 articles in total) – the Final Exam will contain a question worth 10 marks (10 out of 60) that will relate to one of these articles.***Following are examples of factors that will indicate higher order performance in relation to your Final Exam – the following 3 criteria will form the essence of how your performance will be assessed:Evidence of a good grasp of the relevant law evident in a broad knowledge, and accurate use of the lawLegal content must be relevant to the specific issues raised in the questions with responses showing an awareness of how and why the law operates. Having an overview of the relevance of the law to the question in a wider context is also importantEvidence of the application of the relevant law to the questionsThis includes the ability to identify, analyse and resolve issues raised by the questions with particular emphasis on interpreting relevant factual issues and synthesising this interpretation with relevant legal principles in order to demonstrate independent wellreasoned judgementConcise, clear and ordered answersYour answers must directly address the question and allow markers to easily see your work; paragraphs must be short; writing clear and legible; you should be direct and to-the-pointStudents who achieve the factors referred to in all of the above 3 criteria will receive a high mark.Students who fail to achieve the factors referred to in all of the above 3 criteria will receive a low markGeneral Guidance as to levels of performanceFollowing are Grade descriptors that are used by the University to represent student performance – the descriptors are broad in character however provide an idea of the thresholds applicable as concerns each particular level of performance for both specific assessments and for Unit assessment overall. HD [85-100%]Provides consistent evidence of deep and critical understanding in relation to the learning outcomes. There is substantial originality, insight or creativity in identifying, generating and communicating competing arguments, perspectives or problem solving approaches; critical evaluation of problems, their solutions and their implications; creativity in application as appropriate to the program.D [75-84%]Provides evidence of integration and evaluation of critical ideas, principles and theories, distinctive insight and ability in applying relevant skills and concepts in relation to learning outcomes. There is demonstration of frequent originality or creativity in defining and analysing issues or problems and providing solutions; and the use of means of communication appropriate to the program and the audience.CR [65-74%]Provides evidence of learning that goes beyond replication of content knowledge or skills relevant to the learning outcomes. There is demonstration of substantial understanding of fundamental concepts in the field of study and the ability to apply these concepts in a variety of contexts; convincing argumentation with appropriate coherent justification; communication of ideas fluently and clearly in terms of the conventions of the program.P [50-64%]Provides sufficient evidence of the achievement of learning outcomes. There is demonstration of understanding and application of fundamental concepts of the program; routine argumentation with acceptable justification; communication of information and ideas adequately in terms of the conventions of the program. The learning attainment is considered satisfactory or adequate or competent or capable in relation to the specified outcomes.F [0-49%]Does not provide evidence of attainment of learning outcomes. There is missing or partial or superficial or faulty understanding and application of the fundamental concepts in the field of study; missing, undeveloped, inappropriate or confusing argumentation; incomplete, confusing or lacking communication of ideas in ways that give little attention to the conventions of the program.

Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts

(USA, AUS, UK & CA  PhD. Writers)

>> CLICK HERE TO ORDER 100% ORIGINAL PAPERS FROM Academic Writers Bay <<

#065

NUR211, Semester 1, 2018. Task 1University of the Sunshine CoastNUR211, Semester 1, 2018Assessment Task 1: Digital poster presentation: assessment of selected nursingpractice protocol or guidelineGoal:…Group Report: The match between Practice and Research in measuring performanceSubject Learning Outcomes (LOs) assessed (from Subject Outline):a) Analyse the roles of cost and management in organisations…Assignment taskSIT 192 Assignment Task 1 Week 8 QuestionsWeek 8 QuestionsQuestion 1How many positive integers between 300 and 599, inclusive1. are divisible by 3?2. are divisible by 7?3. are divisible by 3 and by 7?4….My topic is Different approaches for Damage detection in structural Health monitoring.FIRST YEARMODELSUCCEED e EXCELManagement and Organisation Behaviour BM01102ASSIGNMENT BRIEF:Second Reflective Journal2018PREPARED BY: Alan McWilliamsASSIGNMENT TITLESecond Reflective JournalThis assessment…ITECH3224/6224 World Wide Web Technology 21517/1520 Assignment 1 – -Microblog- IntroductionThis is an individual assignment in which you are required to develop a dynamic web application as described below…Show All Questions

FIND A SOLUTION  AT  Academic Writers Bay

Recent Question/Assignment
NUR211, Semester 1, 2018. Task 1University of the Sunshine CoastNUR211, Semester 1, 2018Assessment Task 1: Digital poster presentation: assessment of selected nursingpractice protocol or guidelineGoal: The purpose of this task is for you to critique a nursing practice guideline or protocol.Assessment due: Week 6Submission method: Safe Assign in BlackboardCriteria: You will be assessed on your ability to:• Select evidence specific to a selected nursing practice guideline or protocol• Analyse and interpret the evidence supporting the nursing practice guideline or protocol• Communicate findings using digital techniques for a professional audience.Course content:(For further detail see page 1. Item 1.2 ofyour course outline)1. Assessment2. Care planning and management3. Safeguarding and quality4. Professional values and effectiveness5. Communication and partnership6. LeadershipDescription of taskYou will work in pairs as negotiated with the course coordinator and select a nursing protocol or practice guideline from the options made available. You will review, and critique the evidence base of the protocol, and appraise the efficacy of the nursing procedure based on your analysis. You will prepare and submit a digital presentation of your findings in an agreed poster format. For this poster Harvard referencing style is to be used.1NUR211, Semester 1, 2018. Task 1Task 1 Marking RubricFail (UF) Pass (PU)Select evidence specific to a selected nursing practice guideline or protocol Evidence use is unsuitable or insufficient Evidence used is relevant and demonstrates understanding of the guideline or protocolAnalyse and interpret the evidence supporting the nursing practice guideline or protocol Insufficient examination and explanation of the evidence. Analyses and interprets the evidence and creates a logical argumentCommunicate findings using digital techniques for a professional audience. Use of shape, colour, image, language, expression, font, tables, backgrounds and general layout Presentation is disorganised.Academic communication is not consistent.Errors or omission in referencing. Elements are included and create a clear poster presentation.Effective use of graphic elements, pictures, and general layout.Academic communication is consistent and ethical2

Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts

(USA, AUS, UK & CA  PhD. Writers)

>> CLICK HERE TO ORDER 100% ORIGINAL PAPERS FROM Academic Writers Bay <<

#065

T1 2018ASSESSMENT 3: Structured Literature Review —25%This assessment is designed to allow students to identify relevant sources for their research and undertake review on a theoretical concepts/constructs…Assessment Details and Submission GuidelinesTrimester T1 2018Unit Code BN108/BN108DUnit Title Programming for NetworkingAssessment Type IndividualAssessmentTitle Programming fundamentalsPurpose of the…Case Study B – audit planning and internal controlValue: 20%Due date: 06-May-2018Return date: 29-May-2018Length: 2,000 wordsSubmission method optionsAlternative submission methodTaskBackgroundYou are a…COIT20249 Assessment DetailsAssessment item 3—ReportDue date: 4:00 pm AEST, Friday, Week 10 ASSESSMENTWeighting: 30% 3Length: 2500 words +/- 250 wordsObjectivesPlease refer to the Unit Profile to see how…Individual Assignment: ( 2000 words) For the purpose of this assignment, you need to identify a company (Australian Company only) in any industry of your choice and examine the structure of their operation…HA1022 Principals of Financial Markets Group AssignmentIn groups of 3-4, students should choose firstly an industry and secondly two (2) ASX listed companies in this same industry upon which to undertake…Assessment 2: Group assignment Length: 2500 words,This length limit does not include any text, figures, tables, in-text references, the cover page, table of contents, or list of references and any appendices…Show All Questions

FIND A SOLUTION  AT  Academic Writers Bay

Recent Question/Assignment
T1 2018ASSESSMENT 3: Structured Literature Review —25%This assessment is designed to allow students to identify relevant sources for their research and undertake review on a theoretical concepts/constructs that has real world business implications. This assessment relates to Learning Outcomes a, b and dThis article collections and structured review set a basis for literature review section of Research Proposal in Assessment 4.Following consultation with the lecturer or tutor, the students research the field to find four academic articles relating to the research topic as proposed in Assessment 2. The articles must be from 2010 onwards, and all articles must be full papers (not research note or book reviews) sourced from refereed academic journals.Note: Other than in exceptional circumstances, Assessment 3 will set the foundation for literature review of Assessment 4. PRIOR to its inclusion in Assessment 4 Research Proposal, students will be expected to make appropriate adjustments ifrecommended in feedback.The structured literature review should addresses the following information:1. Brief summary of the theory and progression in the field (i.e how has the theory developed)2. Common themes/findings across the four articles3. Different themes/findings across the four articles4. Managerial implication of the four articles5. Study limitations and future research direction proposed in the four articles.Submission Details– Individual Assessment– Word limit: 1500 words (±10%) (excluding reference list)– You need to state the word count of the assessment on the cover page.– The review should be professionally presented using proper headings and sub-headings, in Arial lOpt or Times New Roman 12pt, single space. Harvard (Anglia) style referencing.

Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts

(USA, AUS, UK & CA  PhD. Writers)

>> CLICK HERE TO ORDER 100% ORIGINAL PAPERS FROM Academic Writers Bay <<

#065

ACCT601: Auditing and Assurance Services Semester 2, 2018Assessment 2: Group AssignmentAssessment weight : 20%Due : 13 May 2018 by 23.59Word limit: : 2500 words±10%The group assignment aims to:1….ACC00152 Business Finance Assignment 1:Memo to ManagementYou are working in the finance department of Space Sky Flight Ltd (SSF). The Company has spent $6.5 million in research and development over the…Assignment 1 – Weighted GraphsOverviewYour task is to implement a weighted graph class, offering a reasonably effective suite of operations, including computing the minimum spanning tree, depth and breadth…LAWS20058 – AUSTRALIAN COMMERCIAL LAWTERM 1, 2018 – ASSESSMENT 1 – INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENTMarks: 40% of the overall assessment for the courseSubmission: Online via MoodleFormat: One file in .doc or .docx…LAWS20058 – AUSTRALIAN COMMERCIAL LAWTERM 1, 2018 – ASSESSMENT 1 – INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENTMarks: 40% of the overall assessment for the courseSubmission: Online via MoodleFormat: One file in .doc or .docx…ASSESSMENT 3BUS707 – Applied Business ResearchT1 2018ASSESSMENT 3: Structured Literature Review – 25%This assessment is designed to allow students to identify relevant sources for their research and undertake…Assessment 2Idea GenerationTask Description:The objective of this individual assessment submission is to learn how to develop a business idea, complemented by brainstorming and leveraging the insights…Show All Questions

FIND A SOLUTION  AT  Academic Writers Bay

Recent Question/Assignment
ACCT601: Auditing and Assurance ServicesSemester 2, 2018Assessment 2: Group AssignmentAssessment weight : 20%Due : 13 May 2018 by 23.59Word limit: : 2500 words±10%The group assignment aims to:1. Give students an understanding of real life auditing issues2. Help students understand the link between theory and practice; and3. Foster students’ research, team-working, critical analysis and written communication skills.Students will form teams of up to four members. You should give careful consideration to the selection of members comprising the group. By the end of week 3, all groups must be formed, and groups should provide the names of members to the lecturer-incharge by Monday 2 April 2018. It is very important for all members to take an active part in completing the assignment and make an equal contribution. Students must notify the Lecturer-in-Charge in a timely manner and provide substantiating documentation of any problems in relation to group work. Each student should also complete the “Peer Evaluation of Team Members” sheet and hand it in to the lecturerin-charge.You are required to write a business report addressing the questions below:1. Evaluate the social responsibility of HIH by identifying where they failed.2. Identify weaknesses of HIH’s internal controls and suggest ways for improvement.3. Provide an assessment of the audit committee of HIH, the stance of the auditors regarding the audit committee, and comment on their role in the fallout of the company.4. Describe the major deficiencies of the audit and discuss if auditors could prevent the demise of HIH.Your report should include an introduction, conclusion, appropriate headings, and diagrams or graphs where appropriate. Your report should contain an introduction followed by answers to questions and a conclusion. Grading will be based on critical analysis of the issue, evidence of wide reading on topic, coherence in the development of arguments, use of appropriate evidence, and clarity of expressions. You are expected to cite at least five (5) acceptable sources. If you are not clear what constitutes an acceptable source, please consult the Lecturer-In-Charge.Grading criteria for Assessment #2Questions MaxpointIntroduction1Identify weaknesses of HIH’s internal controls and suggest ways for improvement. 4Provide an assessment of the audit committee of HIH, the stance of the auditors regarding the audit committee, and comment on their role in the fallout of the company. 4Describe the major deficiencies of the audit and discuss if auditors could prevent the demise of HIH. 4Conclusion1Format and presentation (referencing, tidiness, grammar, spelling, spacing, paragraphing, page formatting, etc.) 2Total 20Assignments will be graded by 28 May 2018, and grades will be posted on LEO.Submission guidelinesSubmission is via Turnitin only.Assignments must be submitted with an ACU cover sheet and should:Use an assignment cover sheet signed by all students.Be typed using one-and-a half (1.5) spacing left justified.Use Ariel or Times New Roman font size 12.Display a one inch margin on all sides.Appropriately cite original work, author(s) etc. Citation and referencing must conform to Harvard format both in the body of the paper and its attached reference section.Students should retain both hard and electronic copies of all work submitted forLate submission of assignmentsDue dates will be strictly adhered to. However, in the case of exceptional circumstances, students may apply for extensions in the following manner.In accordance with the ACU Assessment Procedures (para 3):You may seek extension of submission date for an assessment task prior to the due date by submitting the Application for Extension of time for an Assignment (EX) form. https://ift.tt/2HKXacUYou may seek up to five working days after the relevant due date by submitting the Special Consideration form. https://ift.tt/2r8VCTR cial_Consideration_20170615.pdfAssessment tasks submitted after the due or extended date will incur, for each whole or part of a calendar day that the work is overdue, a 5% penalty of the maximum marks available for that assessment task up to a maximum of 15%. Assessment tasks received more than three calendar days after the due or extended date will not be allocated a mark.Links for further reading about HIHHIH Insurance Group Collapse (Parliament of Australia)https://ift.tt/2qm2v3L y_Library/Publications_Archive/archive/hihinsuranceThe rise and fall of HIH Insurance Grouphttps://ift.tt/2jjyjlPThe HIH collapse: a catalyst for costly reform file:///C:/Users/bt/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/INetCache/IE/83Q7UY07/fulltext .pdfCase studies on the HIH Insurance Group file:///C:/Users/bt/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/INetCache/IE/N1RDSLAA/0610 04_BGN-0_hih_background_note.pdfThe HIH Report and Clerp 9 https://ift.tt/2qmDYeKAdams, M. A. (2005). Australian corporate governance: lessons from HIH Insurance. -One Law for All?-: 60th Annual ALTA Conference, The University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand 5-8 July 2005.Buchanan, B. (2003). Beware of the ides of March: The demise of HIH insurance, Finance Faculty Publications, University of Georgia. https://ift.tt/2IIW0i1 m.au/&httpsredir=1&article=1016&context=finance-faculty-publicationsLeung, P. & Cooper, B.J. (2005). The Mad Hatter’s corporate tea party, Managing Auditing Journal, 18 (6/7), 505-516.Mirshekary, S., Yaftian, A, M & Cross, D. (2005). Australian corporate collapse: Thecase of HIH Insurance. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 9 (3). pp. 249-258 PEER EVALUATION OF TEAM MEMBERSEach student should complete this from with respect to other students in the syndicate and hand it in to the lecturer-in-charge.Name (write full name) Meetings Quality and quantity Cooperation and team work Follow through Total scoreMeetings:1 Rarely attended meetings and when attending arrived late or left early2 Attended some group meetings, arrived late or left early on occasion3 Attended most group meetings, arrived on time, stayed for length of time scheduled4 Attended all meetings, arrived on time, stayed longer than the scheduled meeting timeQuality and quantity of output1 Contributed very little, if at all, to the paper2 Ideas were weak, and input limited, performed only work assigned3 Provided useful input most of the time and was helpful in getting tasks accomplished4 Always provided valuable input into the project and facilitated discussionsCooperation and team effort1 Created problems and was disruptive2 Went along with whatever the rest of the group decided3 Sometimes led the group, provided support for other team members on occasion4 Led the group in establishing a cooperative team environmentFollow through1 Rarely completed assignments, work completed was often not useful2 Required some prompting to complete assignments on time, several changes required3 Completed work on time with some changes required4 Completed assigned work on time and error free

Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts

(USA, AUS, UK & CA  PhD. Writers)

>> CLICK HERE TO ORDER 100% ORIGINAL PAPERS FROM Academic Writers Bay <<

#065